Sacred Place - Allie Hanscom

In the film of the aboriginals in Australia, we learned about how this group of oral people made a spiritual claim over the land by painting their hand prints in a cave. Since this culture does not have written documents to legally lay hold of the land that rightfully belongs to them, they create their signatures on the physical land, claiming it as theirs. I thought this was very interesting to compare to our written culture. In our culture, there is an extensive amount of legality and bureaucracy that's involved in owning a piece of land. The system of the hand print in the oral culture could be compared to a deed in our written culture. Although the hand print is not a legally binding document, the people are making more of a spiritual claim or authority over the land. In essence, they are claiming the territory as theirs and marking it as a sacred place.

I thought it was interesting how this system could also be compared to the situation of Mt. Rushmore in America. In class, Dr. Redick made the point that this national landmark could also be considered Americans' spiritual claim of the land. No one is allowed to climb Mt. Rushmore because it's a sacred place. I think it is important to recognize and respect the legitimacy of a culture's claim to land, even if it may look different from your culture's method. Learning about this particular oral culture's traditions, I have been exposed to my own cultural bias. I understand now that certain procedures such as claiming ownership of land is essential to a culture's existence and can be manifested in many different ways.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Campbell - Time and Primal Culture

Campbell - Ossian Mythology and "Oral Texts"

Hanscom - Lion's Gate Statue