Cosler- The Pre-Conceptual
One of the primary concerns of the philosophical field of phenomenology is to breach the classic Kantian divide of noumena and phenomena. Some philosophers simply reject the distinction entirely, while others attempt to work within the traditional framework while still seeking direct contact with the things themselves. One of the barriers to this exercise is often the interference and imposition of a posteriori concepts onto the objects of experience. It is then the job of the phenomenologist to proceed past the barrier of the human conceptual schema in order to achieve his aim. Given this necessity, a paradox seems to present itself in the very way that phenomenologists operate within the professional discipline of philosophy. While more traditional analytic philosophers undoubtedly gain from the complex and traditional nature of the professional hierarchy, it seems that to the phenomenologist the manifold of professional and traditional hoops to jump through regarding philosophical work would impede the goal of complete concept-shedding. How then, do these philosophers benefit from the greater academic system in achieving their goal? Would a phenomenological enterprise conducted outside of such a highly elaborated and abstracted system be more productive in the long run?
Comments
Post a Comment